Question and Answer Forum

Updated September 4, 2010

A fair number of good questions come through Feedback to Bollyn.com which are likely to be of interest to other readers, so I have created this Q&A forum.  The questions follow with the most recent first.  The person who asked about the "Ground Zero" Islamic center "controversy" in New York City sent this kind comment:

Thank you very much for your excellent answer. But then, everything you have written is excellent and well researched.  You are a real hero and an example of courage and honesty.
- from a reader in Geneva, Switzerland

Most Recent Question:  My friend sent me this link about an upcoming 9-11 conference in Manhattan. I wish you were on it. Lenny Charles is putting it together. http://www.howtheworldchanged.org/index.html

Bollyn Responds:  I was not invited to the 9-11 event being put on by Lenny Charles, owner of INN World News.  Judging from the invited speakers and panel subjects, I seriously doubt if his 9-11 event at the Walker Stage will discuss the evidence of Israeli involvement, which is the basis of my thesis about the false flag terror that precipitated the Zionist "War on Terror" and the invasion of Afghanistan.  Having spoken with Mr. Charles on September 3, I am even more inclined to believe that the question of "Who did it?" will not be delved into.  The Orthodox Jewish and Israeli gangsters (e.g. Joseph "Yossi" Shereshevsky, Amnon Cohen, and Avi Benamu) behind the WexTrust Securities scam are the Jewish criminals who financed the current (secret) owners of INN's 56 Walker St. building.  Why are the Israeli partners in the WexTrust fraud being protected by the court and media?  Although the Israelis involved in the WexTrust scam are kept concealed and protected, this is clearly the real reason why Lenny Charles is reluctant to discuss the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11.  The Israeli connection is specifically meant NOT to be on the agenda.  That's what controlled media means.  Even the alternative media is controlled.  Who controls Lenny? (The answer to this crucial question is shocking and will be subject of my next article.)

Lenny Charles (right) of INN World Report


Lenny Charles of INN is the front man for the mystery owner of 56 Walker Street.  Who might that be and why is his identity kept secret?

I don't know much about Lenny Charles.  He said in a 2009 video interview that he is from New Jersey and that he was educated at the El Paso campus of the University of Texas, which is an unusual place for a kid from New Jersey.  Lenny says he was a jazz musician for 25 years before starting INN World News, which is based in a high-rent building in Manhattan's Tribeca neighborhood.  How does Lenny manage it?  Charles is also listed as representing a company called SKG Media and as the contact person for Walker Stage, located at 56 Walker Street in Manhattan.  SKG is often used to refer to the media moguls Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg, and David Geffen, but are they the money behind Lenny Charles and INN?  Walker Stage is a nightclub owned by 56 Walker LLC, whoever that might be.  A search for the owner turns up a host of legal cases that involve 56 Walker LLC and people named Avroham and Joseph Shereshevsky and a sprawling octopus company called Wextrust, which has many holding companies such as WexTrust Capital LLC, doing business in Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan in Israel and operating mining operations in Africa.  How does Lenny Charles and his 56 Walker Street job fit in with all of this gang, which is clearly involved in criminal fraud?

Joseph Shereshevsky (left, son of the rabbi Chaim Shereshevsky of Brooklyn) a Norfolk resident and former COO of WexTrust Capital and Steven Byers, the company's founder and CEO, were each hit with fraud and conspiracy charges.  When he was arrested for his part in the $100 million pyramid scheme in August 2008, Shereshevsky held a one-way plane ticket to Israel.  After they were busted, Byers made a $500 donation to Barack Obama on August 23, 2008. (Courtesy of www.vosizneias.com)

In August 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged WexTrust Capital and its affiliates with fraud, alleging that the company ran a Ponzi scheme that raised at least $255 million by targeting members of the Orthodox Jewish community.  The S.E.C. said WexTrust’s principals, Steven Byers and Joseph Shereshevsky, deceived at least 1,196 investors since 2002. The defendants diverted at least $100 million to unauthorized purposes, according to the S.E.C.’s complaint.  The SEC charge against WexTrust, a Chicago-based company, can be read here.  An interactive time line of the case is here.

Kuwaiti Feisal Abdul Rauf and his proposed Park51 project are supported by the Zionist media mogul Rupert Murdoch, whose company published Rauf's book.  For nine years Murdoch's News Corp. media empire has pushed the evil lie that Muslims were behind the terrorism of 9-11 and promoted the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror" with its wars of aggression and occupation - against Islamic nations and movements.

Bollyn Responds:  BUILDING A MONUMENT TO A FALSEHOOD - This is a sophisticated propaganda ploy by the Rothschild/Zionist-controlled U.S. government and media, designed to underline and cement in the public mind the blatant falsehood that Muslims were responsible for the terror attacks of 9-11.  This project is founded on the false premise of Muslim guilt and is meant to create a permanent monument to the falsehood that 9-11 was carried out by Islamic terrorists.  The people behind this project are the high-level Rothschild agents involved in the Zionist false-flag terrorism and cover-up of 9-11, including New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Rupert Murdoch, whose sprawling media empire has pushed the lies about 9-11and the illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. 

 
High-level Zionist agents Mayor Bloomberg and Rupert Murdoch of News Corp. are key sponsors of Park51 - a monument to the immensely evil media lie that Moslems were behind 9-11.


The Park51 project, based on the false premise that Muslims were behind the false flag terrorism of 9-11, is supported by extremely wealthy Arab leaders such as Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal of Saudi Arabia, who is the second largest shareholder of Murdoch's News Corp.  Any Moslem who supports a monument to such a hateful and anti-Muslim falsehood is a traitor to his faith -- and the truth.

The political support from the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton for this monument reveals it to be a nefarious Zionist plot to hijack the discussion about 9-11 by distracting the public from the real evidence and stirring up anti-Muslim feelings as the ninth anniversary nears.  The recent knife attack on the Moslem taxi driver in Manhattan is the kind of reaction such evil plots produce. 

ENSLAVED BY LIES

The college student accused of slashing the taxi driver simply because he was a Muslim was quickly moved to a psychiatric ward, which is really where anyone belongs who still believes the Zionist fairy tale that Moslems from Afghanistan were behind 9-11.  The government/media version that Osama Bin Laden and 19 Arabs were behind 9-11 remains utterly unproven and flies in the face of evidence of the extremely advanced form of super-thermite that was used to pulverize the Twin Towers.  Bin Laden certainly did not produce or apply the coating of nano-composite super-thermite to the interior surfaces of the World Trade Center towers.  So, who did?  Answer that question and we will solve the crime of 9-11.

The Twin Towers were pulverized by an extremely advanced explosive coating of super-thermite, made with nanotechnology.  How obvious does it have to be before people realize they have been deceived?  To accept a lie is to be enslaved by it.  The suffering and death brought about by the illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are the evil results of being enslaved to the lie that Moslems carried out 9-11.

The Israeli government's plan to destroy two mosques on the West Bank is a similar action of the same strategy, which is meant to cause violence and increase tension and hostility against Islam.  The Israeli announcement of the outrageous plan to destroy the mosques, which are on Palestinian administered territory in the West Bank, is clearly designed to scuttle - with violence - the planned peace talks in September.  Why else would they even consider taking such a unnecessary, self-defeating, and provocative action at this crucial time, especially during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan?

Question:  Do you have any articles about Dov Zakheim? 

Bollyn Responds:  In several articles I have written about Dov Solomon Zakheim, the orthodox Jewish rabbi who was appointed by George W. Bush to oversee the Pentagon budget prior to and after 9-11.  I wrote one a few years ago that focused on him specifically. That article is entitled “9/11 and the Elders of Zion” and can be read at: http://islamic-intelligence.blogspot.com/2008/05/9-11-and-elders-of-zion.html  

I will be writing another article about the Zionist agent Zakheim, which will discuss his long relationship with the Rothschild family and the state of Israel. Zakheim, who is clearly a foreign agent and devoted Zionist with strong links to the Rothschild family, was a member of the Board of Deputies of British Jews in 1971—1972, and a member of the Chief Rabbi's Chaplaincy Board of England, 1971—1972. He then went on to become assistant to the managing director of the U.K. branch of Tibor Rosenbaum’s International Credit Bank Geneva, 1974-75.  This was a criminal enterprise.  

James Casbolt, a former agent of MI6, wrote this about the Mossad-linked bank where Zakheim began his career: 

Tibor Rosenbaum, a MOSSAD agent and head of the Geneva based Banque du Credit International. This bank was the forerunner to the notorious Bank of Credit and Commerce international (BCCI) which is a major intelligence drug money laundering bank. 'Life' magazine exposed Rosenbaum's bank as a money launderer for the Meyer Lanksky American organised crime family and Tibor Rosenbaum funded and supported 'Permindex' the MI6 assassination unit which was at the heart of the John F. Kennedy assassination.   Source: "MI6 Are The Lords of the Global Drug Trade", by James Casbolt (Former MI6 Agent c. 2006) http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=4540  

When Rosenbaum’s criminal bank (where Zakheim worked) was exposed in the mainstream media in 1975 (e.g. TIME magazine), Zakheim, an agent of the Rothschilds, was brought to Washington and began his new career as an associate analyst of National Security and International Affairs with the Congressional Budget Office.  Who did a background check on Dov Zakheim?  Zakheim’s most peculiar move from being a senior executive in a criminal Mossad banking enterprise to a position with the U.S. government happened under the reign of Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, the Rothschild's senior agent in the U.S. government.

Question with Follow-up Comment:  Why do you speak of American soldiers with sympathy in your articles? They are all cold-blooded killers and terrorist occupiers who have murdered millions of innocent Iraqis, Afghanis, Yemenis, Pakistanis, etc. U.S. soldiers are cowardly skum who deserve to be loathed, scorned and cursed in their graves.

Bollyn Responds:  I have sympathy for those who are deceived and that certainly includes most of the American soldiers serving in these criminal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  They have all been misled and deceived.  Do we blame the honest and patriotic young man who has been deceived or do we blame the billionaire master of deception who has tricked the nation into war?  Who am I to pass judgment on a person who has been deceived?   I am doing my best, as I have since September 2001, to expose the evil deception behind 9-11 and the criminal wars that we have been taken into as a result.  I have met many Americans and Europeans who have been tricked into these wars and naturally I really feel very sorry for them and their families because they either don't know or can't control what they are doing.  Many joined the military out of patriotism, like Pat Tillman, or because their parents wanted them to, like the late Dustin Brim of Daytona.  Most, of course, simply signed up because they needed the money.

Pat Tillman turned down a $3.6 million football contract to join the Army Rangers and join the "War on Terror" in Afghanistan, where he was killed by friendly fire in 2004.  Like so many others, he was deceived that the terrorists behind 9-11 had come from that poor and remote Central Asian nation.  Unfortunately, this evil deception continues.


Dustin Brim was a fine 19-year-old from Daytona.  His mother thought the Army would be good for him.  She was promised that he would not be sent into combat.  He worked with damaged tanks and vehicles in Iraq, most of which were contaminated with depleted uranium.  He had no protection against this extremely toxic poison and quickly contracted cancer.  He died age 21.

At a restaurant in Iowa we talked with our waitress who had refused to go back to Iraq after the army had made her drive trucks up and down "suicide alley" - after they had coaxed her to sign up with a $10,000 bonus.  She had been promised that she would have a safe secretarial job but soon found herself driving in fuel convoys on the most treacherous highway in Iraq.  They had lied to her and when she came home for a visit, she refused to go back.  The army wanted the $10,000 back.

Many of the U.S. soldiers are actually from National Guard units, which are not meant for foreign service.  Whether they are drafted or sign up, once these people are sent off to the war, they no longer have a choice.  Their bodies and minds belong to those who command them.  I recall seeing on CNN how the U.S. troops had a talking to before going into Falluja on their revenge mission.  Their commander told them that the people of Falluja were evil and deserved to be killed in the same way that Ilya Ehrenburg told the Soviet troops to kill without mercy the German civilians they came across as they wiped out some 2.1 million innocent Baltic and Eastern Germans at the end of World War II.

I know men who have committed mass murder.  Two that come to mind were young men during the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982, twenty eight years ago.  One was a young Israeli from Kibbutz Afikim in the Jordan Valley, where I worked as a lifeguard at the pool.  I had known this fellow since he was about 13.  His family had migrated to Israel from Argentina and he was a big and friendly boy, at least until he was forced to fight in Lebanon.  Later, he confessed to me about the murders he had committed of whole families in Lebanon during the war.  He had been a member of a tank crew and as they drove through Lebanon families would come out of their homes with white flags.  He had been commanded to fire at them, which he did.  He was very tormented by these unjustified killings and he needed to tell me what he had done.  I felt sorry for him.

More recently, I met a fellow who was involved in the massacre of Palestinians in the refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila.  Again, without asking, this person told me what he had done.  When he showed me his scars on his arms and told me that he had been in Sabra and Shatila, I was quite shocked.  These massacres are among the most horrific war crimes committed by Israel during my life.  This man was only 15 years old when he murdered many innocent people.  He is a Maronite Christian who joined the Phalange (with Elie Hobeika's unit) when he was a 13-year-old boy.  At that tender age, he was given military training in Israel at Nahariya in 1980.  When the Phalange leader Bachir Gemayel was murdered on September 14, 1982, Ariel Sharon sent the Phalange into the Palestinian camps of West Beirut, which the Israeli forces had completely surrounded.  The Phalangists, with assistance and support from Israeli forces, massacred with knives thousands of defenseless refugees during a period of three days.  The 15-year-old had been deceived by Ariel Sharon and the Israeli Mossad that the Palestinians were responsible for the Gemayel murder.  The Israeli military had trained this 13-year-old boy to kill and then used him to murder innocent Palestinians, a crime he will be burdened with forever.

Samuel Maoz, an Israeli veteran of the Israeli invasion of Lebanon of 1982, was a 20-year-old soldier (Israel has obligatory military service) when Israeli forces, under the command of defense minister Ariel Sharon, invaded. Maoz made a film about his experience as a gunner in an Israeli tank, killing hundreds of innocent civilians for no reason. This is a modern example of wrongful killing, a crime that Socrates says is the worst offense one can commit. To kill innocent people inflicts the greater harm and pain on the person who commits such killings. As Socrates has taught the world (via Plato) since about 400 years before Christ, a person who commits such injustice causes more harm to himself than he does to the sufferers of his crime. Unfortunately, this fundamental lesson is not taught to American school children -- or to Israelis. As a result, many wind up as soldiers committing wrongful killings and as a consequence suffer the eternal torment that such actions bring.  

Very much like the young Israeli kibbutznik I knew, Maoz was a gunner in a tank crew and at 6:15 a.m. on the morning of June 6, 1982, he killed a man for the first time in his life. “The rest of the people I killed in the war are just a blur,” he told the Jewish Week. “But not the first one.”  Maoz remembers an officer telling him that when he went into Lebanon, there would be people on the balconies of the apartment buildings. “You can’t open the option of morality,” he says. “He told me, ‘On 50 percent of those balconies you’ll have soldiers with anti-tank missiles. The other half will be ordinary families.’ You see, there are no good guys or bad guys -- you need to kill to stay alive.” 

Steven Erlanger of the New York Times wrote a piece about the Maoz film entitled Lebanon, which is about his actions and crimes committed during the war. For Maoz, now 48, the sense of responsibility for killing remains strong. “There is no escape from it,” he said softly. “In the end you were there, and your finger pulled the trigger…you see the result, and you can’t say you’re not responsible. Maybe in court you’re not guilty. But you can’t cleanse yourself from this guilt.”  Twenty-eight years later, Maoz said that what he did during the war remains the first thing he thinks about in the morning and the last before going to sleep. “I wish it were that simple, just to have nightmares,” he said. “That would be a nice deal to buy.”
 
Reader Follow-up Comment: You mentioned how a 15-year old was trained to kill in preparation of  Sabra and Shatila massacre that took place in 1982. How can someone be "deceived" to kill women and children and unarmed civilians?  ...when someone already has foreknowledge that there are civilians and yet carries out orders to kill knowingly then they're criminals - straight and simply. They're not deceived, they are killers and there's no excuse for them. If we use your logic then why not feel pity for Sharon or Ben Netanyahu and say they were deceived by their parents or his community, or relatives, or whoever it was for indoctrinating the Zionist ideology into his head to make him who he is today.  I'm not saying that they're aren't people deceived into entering a war, but the example of the 15-year old involved in the Sabra and Shatila massacre was a very poor one.

Bollyn Responds:  This is a good point.  First, this boy was only 13 when he was trained by Israelis in Israel.  His Phalangist unit was given military training for three months in Nahariya.  He was not trained to massacre Palestinians with knives, which is what he and his unit did in Sabra and Shatila.  The Israelis cultivated Maronite hatred against the Palestinians with the murder of Bachir Gemayel, as well as previous massacres and killings.  Elie Hobeika, the leader of the boy's militia unit, had secret information on what had really gone on in the camps and was ready to tell it to a court in Brussels when he was blown up in a huge car bomb in Lebanon.  Of course the actions of the boy were criminal, but I consider the real criminals to be the ones who train 13-year-old Lebanese boys and arrange such massacres in the first place and that responsibility falls squarely on the Israeli military leadership, which was the occupying power controlling access to the camps.

Question:  My question is:  Why would Jews want to bring down the World Trade Center?  I understand the Jew Silverstein wanting it for the insurance money, but why would the nation of Israel want it?  Why would Zionists want it?  Was it because they knew it would get the U.S. military to start killing Muslims?  How much control do Zionists have over the U.S. government and its policies?  Is Rockefeller a Zionist?  David Rockefeller was a Baptist, and I don't know of any that are Jews.  Zionists, perhaps?  Why would Baptist bankers, the Mossad, and Zionist Jews all be working so closely together?  That seems like a somewhat strange alliance.  Bush's brother was in charge of security at the World Trade Center and turned off the cameras the weekend before the attacks.  Are the Bushes Zionists too?

Bollyn Responds: This is an excellent set of questions that frames the subject of my next article, which has the working title "The False Flag Terror of 9/11 and Nine Years of Deception."  The media and government deception about 9/11 is massive and clearly very well concerted, but who is really behind the whole thing?  Who has that much power and influence over the U.S. government, the Israeli government, and the mass media, to carry out such a global deception?  Who wields the power behind the Zionist state?  And who does the state of Israel really serve?  Who are the real Elders of Zion?

These are the questions that will be dealt with in the next article, which will probably become the concluding chapter of my book, Solving 9-11.  In the meantime, I will provide these comments and links to give some insights into the subject:

"There is a much larger group behind these [9/11 attacks] which is the international banking cartel which controls trillions of dollars and which has an interest in controlling countries in the Middle East which are not under their control."
- Professor Steven E. Jones on KUER (Salt Lake City's NPR affiliate), September 5, 2006

I have been reading many articles on the 9-11 atrocity and other major world events. I am a 46-year-old Ashkenazi Jew from London, England.  I believe the Rothschilds and the banking conspiracy are behind EVERYTHING. When I bring the subject up with my peers and family, I am told it is anti-Semitic nonsense, probably paid for by the Saudi Arabians.
- Letter to Bollyn.com, April 2010

The Rothschilds are the ultimate financiers of the state of Israel (along with the U.S. Treasury), the Likud terror gang, and the Mossad.  The Rothschilds are also the ultimate owners of the Federal Reserve System and through JP Morgan, of BP.  A BP oil tanker was the first to be filled with stolen Iraqi oil under the U.S.-led occupation, headed by Jerry Bremer of Kissinger Associates.  During the entire time that Bremer controlled the "sales" of Iraqi oil there was no accounting of how much oil was being loaded onto tankers.  See "Ownership of the Federal Reserve" at http://land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/federal_reserve.shtml

The current cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is more than $1 trillion, i.e. more than one thousand billion dollars.  This works out to more than $9,000 per American household or $7,650 per U.S. taxpayer.  See - http://costofwar.com/  Who benefits from the massive U.S. government debt? 

THE ELDERS OF ZION - THE ROTHSCHILDS AND B'NAI B'RITH 

The following extracts are taken from Paul Goldstein's 1978 article entitled, “B'nai B'rith, British Weapon Against America”:

The B'nai B'rith, as the oligarchy's agents-in-place in America, has functioned as the clearinghouse for British subversion against the American republic. Therefore, the story of the B'nai B'rith, its Isis-cult roots, its 136-year record of treason against the United States, is essential to understanding who and what our enemy is, how it operates, and how we will destroy it...

Financing for the British colonization scheme was arranged by Queen Victoria's "favorite Jew" Sir Moses Montefiore, who, along with his brother-in-law Nathaniel Rothschild, used their financial conduits in the United States as a major feature of the plan. The Montefiore Society, the North American Relief Society for Poor Jews in Palestine, the Widows' and Orphan Fund, plus dozens of other benevolent societies, provided the funds to establish a "Jewish homeland"…

The point to be understood about these early developments in the U.S. is twofold. First, the British had to create the conditions for imposing upon American Jews the belief that the American notion of progress and assimilation could not be allowed to occur. Therefore the need for a "separate" Jewish organization based on the mythos of Zion, on the return to the "promised land of Palestine," had to be infused into American Jewish thinking as the only chance Jews had for true salvation…At the time [Samuel] Morse wrote [1860], the B'nai B'rith was a British intelligence cult dedicated to the destruction of the American Republic. It was an arm of British intelligence with that chartered purpose at the time of its founding in 1843, and remains so to this day…

B'nai B'rith emerged in 1842 as the American extension of the "Jewish" Rite of Freemasonry in America.  According to the history of B'nai B'rith by Edward Grusd, "the mastermind" behind the early growth of this Jewish Masonic order was Baruch Rothschild, relative of the original Meyer Amshel Rothschild who founded the family banking dynasty in 18th century Germany.

Baruch Rothschild, from Bavaria, was trustee of account No. 10,744, a bank account for the Zion Widow and Orphan Society, which was the B'nai B'rith.  The B'nai B'rith was created by the Rothschild family.

Rothschild was sent into the B'nai B'rith shortly after its founding to launch a ''membership drive" because, as he himself put it, "the members were not all equally well educated and of far different mental capacities." In short, B'nai B'rith was not for just any Jew. Through Rothschild's building job, it was to become an intelligence executive body, whose leaders would subsequently play controlling roles in other British networks, directing the Abolitionist-Slaveholder confrontations of the 1840s and 1850s, the Secession of the South that produced the Civil War, the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, and numerous post-war destabilizations of the American Republic. - “B'nai B'rith, British Weapon Against America”, by Paul Goldstein, The Campaigner, December 1978 
http://wlym.com/campaigner/7812.pdf

Question:  Recently, the editor of Uncensored magazine (New Zealand) sent me an e-copy of your e-book Solving 9-11 - The Deception that Changed the World.  Wow!  I thought I knew a lot, but your book reveals/exposes so much more and connects all the dots!  So far, I've only read the first 50 pages and I must say, it is certainly one of the best books on this topic.  I can't wait to read more... I will certainly be telling everyone I know about your book and website, which I spent hours reading the other day.  Excellent!  I could see the years and depth of research that has gone into your work.  Good on you!

Question -  Is a hard copy of your book available?  If so, where and how much?  A few people I know have been asking.

Bollyn Responds:  No.  My book has not been published, so the only way to get a hard copy is to print the book out from my website.  This is the easiest way to get the information to the widest audience anywhere in the world for the least cost.  I provide the information, the reader provides the paper and printer. The complete book (in its current edition) and the nine years of background articles I have written about 9-11 can all be printed out free of charge by clicking on the online book section of Solving 9-11 - The Deception that Changed the World.  There is an easily printed pdf version of the book or you can go to the Table of Contents and select the individual chapters and articles by clicking on the bold blue titles.  There are about 150 articles from 2001 through 2009 that can be accessed through the table of contents or the archives found in the left-hand margin.

Question:  I have read your essay about The Coming American Revolution, which includes the following statement: "Armed resistance, on the other hand, such as that of the Hezbollah in south Lebanon, is the legally and morally justified resistance to an armed invasion. The Intifadah of Palestine is fully justified as the legal resistance to the illegal occupation of Palestinian land. These resistance movements are defensive, essential, and legal and I certainly would not condemn them." 

Christopher, I agree with most of what you write, but I don't see how you can allow the use of violence for armed resistance (Palestine, Iraq, and Afghanistan) and disallow it for armed rebellion (in the USA or UK). If the people of Palestine, Iraq, and Afghanistan have the right to fight for their freedom by whatever means necessary, why shouldn't the people of the USA have the same right? Surely not because we have 'elected' our representatives. Your own critique of voting machines and elitist control of the political parties, the political process, and the media, demonstrates that the institution of government in the USA is not representative or consensual.  

9/11 demonstrated unequivocally that the elitist rulers of the USA have no respect for the lives of US citizens. The claim to authority by the US government over US citizens was certainly broken on 9/11. Why shouldn't an American have the same right to fight for their freedom as the people of Palestine, Iraq, and Afghanistan have?

Bollyn Responds: The statement about legally and morally justified resistance to an armed invasion is actually from my Statement on the Importance of Non-Violence.  In "The Coming American Revolution" I wrote this about violence and revolutions:

Revolutions are usually associated with violence, but they don't have to be.  Since 1990, half the nations of Europe and Asia have gone through peaceful revolutions that replaced the former dictatorships of the once mighty Soviet Union.  The apartheid regime of South Africa also came to an end without violence.  The revolution to restore the sovereignty of the American people certainly need not be violent, and really should not be.

This is an excellent question and most appropriate for July 4, when we celebrate the signing of the Declaration of Independence, which articulates the fundamental political philosophy of the American Revolution.  I am in complete agreement with the signers of July 4, 1776:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.

Ben Franklin, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson working on the Declaration of Independence

I think the American form of government, as enshrined in the Constitution, is a truly excellent system of government.  The U.S. Constitution has been adopted by other nations.  Switzerland, for example, used the U.S. Constitution as their model and it has worked very well.  The primary difference is that in Switzerland the legislative branch has more power than the executive branch.  They did not want an all-powerful president, which I think was a wise decision.  In the United States, the executive branch has far too much power having taken over powers that rightfully belong with the people's representatives.  The right to declare war, for example, belongs to the U.S. Congress - not the president.

There are many reasons why I am opposed to the use of violence in the struggle to reclaim our lost sovereignty in the United States of America.  Firstly, because it is neither called for nor would it be effective.  Americans have lost their sovereignty because they have not been vigilant or engaged.  If one compares the Swiss system to ours it is clear that the citizens of Switzerland are much more involved in the running of their confederation.  If we were to liken our two states to gardens we could say that the Swiss garden is carefully maintained, watered, and weeded.  The American garden, on the other hand, has been neglected and has become terribly overgrown with noxious weeds that have taken over and suffocated the beautiful flowers and bushes that were planted by the original gardeners 234 years ago. 

The American system gives citizens the power to choose their representatives.  The just powers of our government come only with the consent of the governed.  This is how our democratic franchise is supposed to work.  The fundamental problem with the American republic today is that this representation has become a fiction because our elections are fraudulent.  Our presidents and Congressmen do not represent the American people but are beholden to the people who put them in power, i.e.  the people who own and control the electronic voting machine systems used across the United States.  These people have stolen our sovereignty but maintain the fiction that the American people still elect their representatives.  Anyone who has been involved in U.S. elections knows that the whole two-party system is rigged, from the control of the parties and selection of candidates to the counting of votes.  Both political parties are owned by big money and special interest groups.

The most effective way to restore the stolen sovereignty to the American people is to restore integrity and transparency to our elections.  The only way to get our nation back is to return to hand-counted paper ballots in every polling place across the United States.  The American people can do this without violence.

Question:  RE:  “Why Do Jews Commit Massacres?” 

Very well-written article. They accept no rules but the ones they choose to accept.  However, what I'm wondering now is why can't they even understand why the rest of the more-sane world is viewing them as sociopaths??  Unless, of course, they actually are sociopaths as well as pathological liars. 

Bollyn Responds:  This is an excellent question that goes directly to the serious antisocial personality disorder of the "Jewish state" of Israel.  The world is a society of nations, and like individuals, nations have personalities.  The state of Israel, a racial/tribal state in which orthodox rabbis have a great deal of influence over laws and policies, clearly has an antisocial personality disorder.  The question is:  Do Israelis not understand that the rest of the world views their state as sociopathic?  This question raises another:  If Israel is a sociopathic state, how did it become sociopathic?

To understand what is meant by sociopaths and sociopathic disorder I recommend reading Profile of the Sociopath at http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html

A sociopath is a psychopath with strongly antisocial tendencies.  In the 1800s this personality disorder was called "moral insanity." By 1900 it had changed to "psychopathic personality" and is now called "antisocial personality disorder."

Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD or APD) is defined by the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) as "a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others." 

The state of Israel has a long history of showing "disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others" and consistently displays the following behaviors, which are common features of sociopathic people:

Sociopaths never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behavior as permissible. They may appear to be charming, but are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used. They may dominate and humiliate their victims.

They have no problem lying and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. They can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities.

They have a deep seated rage, which is split off and repressed, at their core. They do not see others around them as people, but only as targets and opportunities. Instead of friends, they have victims and accomplices who end up as victims. The end always justifies the means and they let nothing stand in their way.

When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive. Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person. Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises.

They are unable to empathize with the pain of their victims, having only contempt for others' feelings of distress and readily taking advantage of them.

They believe they are all-powerful, all-knowing, and entitled to every wish.  They show no sense of personal boundaries and have no concern for their impact on others.  They may even state that their goal is to rule the world.  Their goal is the enslavement of their victim(s) and they seek to exercise despotic control over every aspect of the victim's life.

The sociopath does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed.  A sociopath does not perceive that anything is wrong with them.

There is a disregard for and violation of the right's of others, those right's considered normal by the local culture (or international law).  ASPD is indicated by at least three of the following.  I have indicated those behaviors which Israel displays consistently:

    A. Repeated acts that could lead to arrest.  (Israel often violates international law, e.g. war crimes in Gaza and Lebanon, and the recent piracy and murders committed against the Freedom Flotilla.)

    B. Conning for pleasure or profit, repeated lying, or the use of aliases.  (Israel is constantly conning the U.S. government and always lies about its actions.  Israelis often use aliases, even committing Mossad murders using stolen identities of foreigners visiting Israel.)

    C. Failure to plan ahead or being impulsive.  (Israel is often taking actions that backfire.  Are such blunders really intentional?)

    D. Repeated assaults on others.  (Israel has attacked all of its neighbors and nations far away.  Nearly all of its assaults have been illegal under international law.)

    E. Reckless when it comes to their or others safety.  (The aggressive and illegal actions of the Israeli state put all Israelis and Jews at risk.  They claim to be acting on behalf of the Jewish people but their reckless actions increase the dangers for all Jews, even those who have nothing to do with Israel.)

    F. Poor work behavior or failure to honor financial obligations.  (Israel never actually repays its loans from the U.S.  These loans are all eventually rolled onto the U.S. taxpayer, who winds up footing the Israeli bill.)

    G. Rationalizing the pain they inflict on others.  (Israel always rationalizes the pain and suffering they inflict on the Palestinian and Lebanese.  Israel even blames the Freedom Flotilla for the deaths of the nine people killed by Israeli Defense Forces – on the high seas.)

If one considers the behavior of the state of Israel, as expressed through the actions and words of its leaders, especially since the late-1970s when the extreme right-wing Likud Party came to power, one can easily see that Israel – as a state – displays all the symptoms of antisocial personality disorder.  It should be remembered that the Likud Party of prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu is the political party of the former Irgun terrorists, headed by such notorious Zionist terrorists as Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir.  A political party founded by mass murderers and terrorists certainly must be seen as having antisocial tendencies.

Although many clinicians use the terms psychopath and sociopath interchangeably, a sociopath's criminal behavior is shaped by social forces and is the result of a dysfunctional environment, according to psychopath expert Robert Hare in his book Without Conscience. 

WITHOUT CONSCIENCE

The Israeli state acts without conscience or respect for international law or the norms of civilized society.  This is why I call Israeli behavior "amoral" rather than "immoral".  Israelis do not act according to the moral standards of the civilized world but follow a completely different set of rules based on the Talmud, which apply only to them.  The Talmudic laws that guide the behavior of orthodox Jews (and Israelis) turn the Ten Commandments on their head and discriminate between Jews and non-Jews, who are seen as less-than-human beasts.  (See Israel Shahak's excellent book Jewish History, Jewish Religion online.)  It is important to note that the key people involved in the 9-11 crime and cover-up are all Israelis, orthodox Jews, and rabbis (e.g. Alvin K. Hellerstein, Michael Chertoff, and Dov Zakheim).

Orthodox Judaism as defined by the rabbis (i.e. Talmudic teaching) is the basis of the "antisocial religion," which is the origin of the "social forces" and "dysfunctional environment" behind the antisocial personality disorder of the state of Israel.  Orthodox Jewish children are raised with a supremacist worldview that Jews are superior to all other people and that non-Jews exist only to serve Jews.  This sociopathic doctrine of Jewish supremacism is taught to all Israeli children, even those from non-religious families.  The discrimination against non-Jews is reinforced by the language of the Jews, which calls a non-Jewish woman a "shiksa" and a non-Jewish man a "shegetz".  The Hebrew root word of both is "shegua", which means something so foul that it cannot be touched.

Tacitus, the Roman senator and historian of the 1^st Century, described the antisocial behavior of the Jews, which were part of the Roman Empire of his time:  "Among the Jews all things are profane that we hold sacred; on the other hand they regard as permissible what seems to us immoral."

The antisocial essence of the Jewish religion is caused by "the hatred" (i.e. "the deep seated rage" of sociopaths) with which they confront the "rest of the world", as Tacitus wrote:

The other practices of the Jews are sinister and revolting, and have entrenched themselves by their very wickedness. Wretches of the most abandoned kind who had no use for the religion of their fathers took to contributing dues and free-will offerings to swell the Jewish exchequer; and other reasons for their increasing wealth may be found in their stubborn loyalty and ready benevolence towards brother Jews. But the rest of the world they confront with the hatred reserved for enemies.

Question:  How do you prove if a person has been exposed to Depleted Uranium (DU) and what can a person do about the health problems it causes, such as brittle teeth? Does the Veterans Administration (VA) have a policy to help and compensate veterans?  I am a retired Army officer, my son was in Iraq with the first group that went in. He was there for 13 months. His job included evacuation of blown out damaged and destroyed armor vehicles, artillery, and tanks from the battle field along with moving troops in and out the front lines. He has a series of health issues that I believe are a result of his time in Iraq (including brittle teeth since he returned) and it is taking a toll. I find it hard for the VA not to acknowledge there is a problem when there is so much documentation and research on the subject. Something needs to be done to help veterans like my son with this.

Bollyn Responds:  This is a very relevant question because there are currently more than 800,000 disabled vets from the Gulf War Era (300,000 from Desert Storm in 1991 and 500,000 from Operation Iraqi Freedom since 2003).   I have written a series of articles about the very real health damage caused by the use of depleted uranium.  These articles are ground-breaking in that they explain the extreme danger of what is called "the particle effect," which is caused by exposure to nano-size particles of DU. 

To see if there had been any changes in the position of the military regarding DU exposure, I turned first to the VA website where I found that they still deny the existence of any health problems among vets related to depleted uranium: 

Health Problems Associated with Depleted Uranium  

DU is a health hazard if it enters the body, such as through embedded fragments, contaminated wounds, and inhalation or ingestion. Simply riding in a vehicle with DU weapons or DU shielding will not expose a service member to significant amounts of DU or external radiation.   The potential for health effects from internal exposure is related to the amount of DU that enters a person’s body.

So far no health problems associated with DU exposure have been found in Veterans exposed to DU. Researchers and clinicians continue to monitor the health of these Veterans. Go to the Department of Defense's Depleted Uranium (DU) Library* to learn about results of medical and scientific research and other DU topics.

Source: http://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/depleted_uranium/index.asp 

Although the VA claims it has found "no health problems" from DU exposure, the following section on VA Benefits certainly says otherwise:  "Veterans who were exposed to depleted uranium during military service may be eligible for health care benefits."  The VA also says it provides "disability compensation benefits for disabilities that VA determines are associated with depleted uranium exposure." 

Why would veterans exposed to DU be eligible for health care  and disability benefits if the VA claims there are "no health problems associated with DU exposure"?  This makes no sense.

I then contacted Doug Rokke, a U.S. Army (ret.) expert on the effects of DU. In previous interviews Rokke had informed me that he suffered from brittle teeth as a result of his exposure to DU. I asked Rokke about the problem with brittle teeth among vets. 

This is a "severe" problem, Rokke said. He lost all of his teeth due to DU. "They disintegrate," he said. This he said is caused by DU's effect on phosphorus and calcium.  Asked about the VA claim that "no health problems" have been found related to DU exposure, Rokke said, "They lie through their teeth." They know all about the serious health problems caused by DU but are unwilling to acknowledge the connection. 

Comment from a relative of a 9-11 victim:  I am so shocked and horrified by the information I am reading here. My dear cousin Tom was the co-pilot on American Airlines Flight 11 and I believe he was one of the first to die that day.  Reading that the government of Israel had advance knowledge of this, that the so-called movers were actually Israeli operatives exposes Israel in a light I had never before imagined, yet I cannot disregard. The tragic death of this husband and father, as well as all the other innocent lives lost that day, is brutally compounded by the complicity of one of this nation's allies.

Bollyn Responds:  This poignant comment from a relative describes our common 9-11 predicament very well.  The evidence of Israeli (and Zionist agents) involvement in the terror atrocity cannot be disregarded.  The events of 9-11 (and the subsequent cover-up of the truth) are of much greater historical importance than simply being the seminal events of the fraudulent "War on Terror."  The false-flag terror atrocity of 9-11 is the harbinger of a revolutionary change in world history.  The role of our corrupt political systems and the controlled media in the cover-up of what really happened on 9-11, and the growing awareness of this evil deception, presents us with a pregnant political situation which can only be called pre-revolutionary.  The official version of 9-11 has been proven to be nothing but a pack of treasonous lies.  The political status quo, in which the Zionist-controlled political establishment exploits blatant lies about 9-11 to carry out illegal wars of aggression and impose draconian "homeland security" policies on the American population is neither acceptable nor tenable in the long run.  The tremors that precede the upheaval can already be felt.

Question:  I just wish that you had footnoted your writings.  I would love to believe you, but without sources backing up your facts, it makes it difficult.

Bollyn Responds:  This skeptical reader raises a very good point.  In my articles written as a professional journalist (2000- October 2006) I always provided the sources of the information in the text.  Since 2007, when I began writing my book Solving 9-11 - The Deception that Changed the World, I mention the sources in the text (as a journalist should) and give the details and location of the material at the end.  By providing the documents and sources of the information I try to make it easy for the reader to check the veracity of the information found in my articles and see it in its full context.  I am certainly not asking for anyone to "believe" anything I write.  One publisher sent my chapter on the Architecture of Terror to an independent and professional fact checker in Britain.  The fact checker was actually opposed to my hypothesis that Israel was involved in the terrorism of 9-11 and examined more than 100 points or facts that I present in this key chapter.  Every one of them was found to be correct.  As Professor Steven E. Jones would say, "The data doesn't lie." 

Question:  We met in the summer of 2005 when you brought William Rodriquez [9-11 survivor from the World Trade Center] to speak at the Schaumburg Library [Illinois]. You mention in your notice to Eric Hufschmid that you categorize him with Mike Piper and Darrel Bradford Smith – why?  You also referred to Victor Thorn who seems to have lifted some of your ideas about Zionist involvement in 9/11.  Are Piper and Smith disinformation agents? 

I have Piper's Final Judgment.  I think your research is impeccable and felt badly when you "left" AFP. Your online 9/11 book is amazing. I hope that you and your family are happy and secure. I have noted that people who divulge too much truth, like Sterling, Peggy Seagrave, and yourself receive similar treatment and have to flee.

Bollyn Responds: This is a good question about a subject that I don't usually delve into, but which certainly deserves to be discussed because it concerns the role of the Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) as the source of much of the deception and evil that afflicts our world today. 

The people you ask about:  Hufschmid, Piper, Smith, and Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Victor Thorn), are four detractors who have spent years attacking me and waging a vicious campaign of slander and libel against me and my family.   What these agents of deception have done is spread lies and calumnies about me, my wife and children in an effort to discredit me and damage my credibility and reputation. Smith revealed how this vicious slander campaign works in a taped telephone conversation with Eric Hufschmid. I have written about this in an article entitled "Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can", which is exactly what Smith told Hufschmid to do. Why would Smith want to "slam" me, an honest journalist and leading 9-11 researcher?   

While Hufschmid has not attacked me as maliciously as the others, he has made the ridiculous claim since the summer of 2007 that I have been kidnapped by the Mossad. Using this bizarre claim (which he stubbornly maintains despite abundant proof to the contrary) he says that my writing is "bait" approved by Israeli intelligence. Although he employs a different method, Hufschmid's slander against me has achieved the same result. He has successfully sown suspicion about my credibility and drawn attention to me as a person while completely marginalizing my 9-11 research, which he has ignored since 2007.    

To understand what this slander campaign is really all about, and who is behind it, we need to employ some Socratic dialectic. We will start by asking a simple question: Are these people attacking me as a defensive tactic because I have attacked them or treated them badly?  

No. I have not wronged any of these people and not even discussed them until after they began attacking me. As a matter of fact, I have helped all of them a great deal. I helped Piper, for example, with his RBN radio show when I filled in for him for several weeks in a row, while on the road with my family in the West during the summer of 2006. This required a great deal of time and effort on my part - with absolutely no compensation. Does Piper do his daily show from free?   

I also helped Piper by appearing several times as a guest on his show, as I did for Hufschmid and Smith's "French Connection" show. While I agreed to be interviewed by Piper, Hufschmid, and Smith, I have always worked as an independent journalist (for Spotlight and AFP from 2000 until October 2006) and was never affiliated with any of them in any way.  I have been interviewed by many people.  Being interviewed by a person or having my material posted on somebody's website does not indicate any deeper association than that.  The attempts to link me with Hufschmid and Smith are part of an intel trap to discredit my work by connecting me with them.  Piper always introduced me with fulsome praise, calling me "America's best journalist, bar none." Piper, Hufschmid, and Smith have, as a matter of fact, all greatly relied on and gained from the original 9-11 research I have done. None of them can say that they have suffered because of knowing me. So why do they attack me?

 
Christopher Bollyn (left) and Darrel Setters (a.k.a. Darrel Bradford Smith) at Smith's home in central France, the morning after Thanksgiving 2005

Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) wrote a book about Israel's role in the 9-11 attacks (that I have not read), which must contain a great deal of my research. Thorn's book was published by American Free Press, where I worked from 2000 until October 2006. 

Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Victor Thorn)

Although I was the first journalist to write about the Israeli role in the 9-11 attacks and have done far more research (for eight years) than any other writer on the subject, AFP was never interested in doing a book about 9-11 with me. This is an intelligence tactic called "stealing the thunder." If AFP were truly interested in exposing the Israeli role in 9-11, why have they not asked to publish my ground-breaking book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World?   

So, what have I done to deserve being subjected to the vicious and concerted campaign of calumny, slander, and libel? What is it that I have done that bothers them so much that they spend time attacking me?   

This is easy. Apart from raising my family, for the past eight years my only vocation has been to research and write about the false-flag terrorism of 9-11. As an investigative journalist I have led the way in investigating the role of Israeli intelligence and Zionist agents in the United States in the terror attacks of 9-11.   

If my 9-11 research and writing is the reason these detractors are attacking me with slander and libel, who are they doing it for?    

It stands to reason that these four are working as agents of an agency that is interested in my research being discredited and marginalized. Because my thesis is that the state of Israel and Zionists in the U.S. are behind 9-11, these must be the same entities behind the anti-Bollyn slander campaign. This makes sense because well-known Zionist entities such as Rupert Murdoch's FOX News, CNN, and the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz have all tried to smear me as an anti-Semite.   

Are these four detractors connected with a Zionist agency or the state of Israel?   

Eric Hufschmid's father, with whom he works closely, is the father of the wife of Rupert Murdoch's son James, heir apparent of the Murdoch media empire. Smith is a former narcotics user who has several felony convictions that were suddenly cleared up immediately before he began his career with "The French Connection" in early 2005.   

Piper and Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) work for a newspaper called American Free Press, where I worked as an independent contractor (since the fall of 2001) after being hired in the spring of 2000. AFP claims to be an employee-owned newspaper, which is a deception meant to fool readers. AFP has no assets to own. Everything of value associated with the Liberty Lobby and American Free Press is held by a host of shell companies with names like "The Committee to Expose Bunk", which issued my paychecks, for example. Michael Piper is one of the people allowed to sign checks from these entities.    

The person who is the mastermind of the shell game involving the assets of the Liberty Lobby is Mark Lane, the Jewish lawyer who played a crucial role in the massacre at Jonestown, Guyana. 

Mark Lane was present at Jonestown during the massacre.  He is considered to have played a key role in provoking the massacre by playing on the fears of Jim Jones.  This photo with Jones (left) was taken shortly before the mass suicide/massacre.  How odd that Lane became the lawyer, and then owner of the Liberty Lobby several years later.

Lane has been the lawyer of the Liberty Lobby since the mid-1980s and received some $5 million in legal fees, according to a veteran Liberty Lobby insider. Lane, who served in U.S. Army Intelligence in Germany at the end of the war, acquired the assets of the Liberty Lobby in 1993 or 1994, according to L.T. Patterson (owner of Criminal Politics), who discovered this fact during a court process in which Lane was suing Patterson.   

Who does Lane work for?    

Lane must work for the C.I.A. Having worked for Army Intelligence in the mid-1940s, it stands to reason that Lane became one of the head honchos in the Jewish intelligence cabal in Army Intelligence that became the C.I.A. in 1949. This would explain Lane's role in his writings on the Warren Report, the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War, Jonestown, and the so-called patriot movement at the Liberty Lobby.   

But isn't the C.I.A. working to protect the nation and the people of the United States?   

Obviously not. The C.I.A. was criticized for being asleep at the switch on 9-11, but it is really much worse than that. The C.I.A. actually works against the interests of the republic and the American people. The C.I.A. is obviously deeply involved in the commission of the terrorism crime of 9-11. Rather than preventing 9-11 or finding the culprits of the atrocity, the C.I.A. has been exploiting the 9-11 deception to wage war using drone warfare in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Asked about the C.I.A. attacks in Pakistan, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton responded as if she had no legal authority or control over the C.I.A., which was a remarkably candid response from a U.S. Secretary of State. Her response indicated that the C.I.A. is a rogue agency that acts outside the control of the U.S. administration. How can that be?   

What is the C.I.A.'s interest in Afghanistan and Pakistan?    

The C.I.A. is clearly not interested in solving 9-11 or finding the culprits. We know that the Twin Towers were demolished using an advanced form of super-thermite (produced using nano-technology) and that the official version that Osama Bin Laden carried out 9-11 from a cave in Afghanistan is nothing but a pack of lies. The C.I.A. is involved in Afghanistan because that's where most of the world's opium is produced. George H.W. Bush, the former director of the C.I.A., was also a director of the Eli Lilly Company, the pharmaceutical giant that manufactures Prozac. Bush was also one of the first students at Israel's Yonatan [Netanyahu] Institute of terrorism in 1979. Since the production of opium has skyrocketed since the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, we can assume that opium production is one of the purposes of the war and occupation. Prior to the invasion of 2001, the Taliban regime, which the U.S. is fighting against, had succeeded in eradicating nearly all opium production in Afghanistan.   

This explains why American Free Press was so strongly opposed to my articles about the dangerous effects of Prozac and similar drugs. When Ellen Mariani, a 9-11 widow, told me that the grieving relatives had been sent to Red Cross doctors who had prescribed Prozac – the editor at AFP cut it out of the story. My subsequent articles about serotonin-affecting drugs and school shootings were rejected out-of-hand. This was clearly a subject that the American Free Press did not want to take up.     

One has to remember what Andreas von Bülow said about intelligence agencies in December 2001: "Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation." The first target of the deception and disinformation of the C.I.A. is the people of the United States. This is a rogue agency that must be disbanded if the American republic is to survive. The C.I.A. is no sacred cow, some sacrosanct institution that can be allowed to carry out its own agenda, wage war, and maintain secret prisons, all in the name of our democratic American republic. The C.I.A. is a rogue agency that is obviously an enemy of American democracy. The United States of America cannot survive as a democratic republic with the C.I.A. operating as the shadow government. The C.I.A. is nothing but a band of organized criminals operating under the guise of the United States. By dissolving the C.I.A. we would obtain answers to many of the crimes committed in the past 60 years.

Question:  I am making an appeal that you repost the following important articles on your website or link to them somewhere. They are increasingly getting harder to find on the Internet. Many sites just link back to your site and yet they are no longer available at Bollyn.com Some people are just beginning to wake up - they really need to hear what happened and understand the nature and character of Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith. I hope to see this information on your site again soon.

"Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can" – Daryl B. Smith (Understanding the Methods of Defamation)
Open Letter to Eric Hufschmid
James B. Phillips Open Letter to Eric Hufschmid & Daryl B. Smith
Bollyn Responds to Malicious Slander of Daryl B. Smith 

Bollyn Responds:  I have recently received quite a few questions about my detractors, namely Michael Piper, Daryl B. Smith, and Eric Hufschmid.  I have reposted these articles under the section entitled The Cure for Disinfo.  As the former German intelligence chief Andreas von Buelow told me in December 2001, "Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation."  Marion Fulk, the retired scientist of the Manhattan Project and Livermore Lab, used to tell me that the government "has buildings full of agents" to do their dirty work.  When we would go to a restaurant in Livermore after a day spent studying the effects of depleted uranium, there would be several agents tailing us and listening to our conversation.  My detractors and those who slander and libel me are working for such people.  The truth is coming out and we can all see who has been working for the truth and who has not.  The functions of Michael Piper and sticky fly-paper operations like American Free Press are a bit more complicated and something I will take up in the next question. 

Marion Fulk (left) and Christopher Bollyn at Fulk's home in Livermore, California

Question of April 14:  In human history, are you aware of examples in which the entire population of a country believed in a lie for years, then discovered the lie?  Does recognition of truth happen rapidly?  What is the usual outcome?  What do you predict Mr. Bollyn?

The Katyn Massacre Memorial

Bollyn Responds:  Big lies are really not that unusual, especially when massacres are involved. History is littered with them.  The Katyn Massacre comes to mind. The recent crash of the plane of the Polish president and 96 others has brought this extremely painful “Big Lie” back into the spotlight.  The Katyn Massacre was the mass murder of some 22,000 Polish nationals by the Soviet secret police, a massacre which had been approved by the entire Soviet Politburo, including Joseph Stalin, Britain's ally in its "unnecessary war" against Germany. Nazi Germany announced the discovery of mass graves in the Katyn Forest in 1943 and was immediately blamed - without a single stitch of evidence - by the Allies and Western media for the atrocity.  Hitler actually called for an investigation into the killings, although it was not until 1990 that the Soviet Union officially acknowledged and condemned the perpetration of the killings by the Soviet NKVD, and the subsequent cover-up.

The Ground Zero Cross

The massacre and terror atrocity of 9-11 are very similar to the Katyn Massacre.  The blame was wrongly placed on Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida - without any evidence - in order to usher in the pre-planned "War on Terror" with an illegal invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, and subsequently Iraq.  The crucial evidence of the crime of 9-11 was quickly destroyed and a politically controlled non-investigation managed under the direction of Michael Chertoff, a dedicated agent of the actual culprits - Israeli intelligence and their Zionist quislings in the United States. 

Michael Chertoff was the key person responsible for the destruction of the evidence of 9-11 - and the cover-up.  Chertoff, the son of an Israeli Mossad agent named Livia Eisen, is an Israeli by birth. 

The Zionist-controlled media ignored the evidence of Israeli involvement and pushed the official version, which is really nothing more than a pack of lies.  Nothing good will ever come from such evil deceit, and nothing good has come from the lies surrounding 9-11.   For more than 8 years the world has been deceived about what really happened on 11 September 2001 and why we are engaged in the War on Terror - but the truth is coming out.  The dam of lies and deceit is breaking and it is no longer possible to hold back the Truth.  The culprits and those who have assisted the cover-up are becoming very uncomfortable.  The liars and rats of the 9-11 deception will be washed away by the flood waters of Truth.

The Dedication of the Cross

Comment of April 9:  Dear Mr Bollyn. I am one of your fans. I thought you would like this article, in case you did not read it yet. I wonder if Mr. Wilkerson [Col. Lawrence B.] might be one of many "whistle blowers" who come to light in coming weeks and months? 

George W. Bush 'knew Guantánamo prisoners were innocent'
The Times (U.K.) April 9, 2010
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7092435.ece

George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld covered up that hundreds of innocent men were sent to the Guantánamo Bay prison camp because they feared that releasing them would harm the push for war in Iraq and the broader War on Terror, according to a new document obtained by The Times.   

 
Donald Rumsfeld believed that releasing the innocent detainees would harm the Administration, according to a signed declaration by a top aide to Colin Powell.

Who said never again?  Guantanamo is a real concentration camp in our time.  Children as young as 12 and 13 and elderly as old as 92 or 93 were taken to Gitmo.  Why are the people behind this outrageous crime being protected from prosecution?  When will President Obama close the Gitmo Gulag and begin an investigation of the abuses committed there?  Why delay what has to be done?

Answer:  Yes, there will certainly be others coming forward who will expose the lies and deception of 9-11 and the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror."  The real question is when and what kind of legal action will follow to investigate and punish those who are really behind 9-11 and the subsequent "War on Terror" that has destroyed so many lives?  I recommend Andy Worthington's article of April 14. “Wilkerson Demolishes Bush, Cheney, And Rumsfeld’s Lies About Guantanamo” in The Public Record:

For Col. Wilkerson, who remains “extremely concerned that the Armed Forces of the United States, where I spent 31 years of my professional life, were deeply involved in these tragic mistakes,” the need for accountability has a particularly personal meaning, but for the rest of us, it should be no less important that torture was used to justify an illegal war, that it infected the U.S. military, that those who authorized it remain free to continue spreading their poisonous lies (in Dick Cheney’s case, at least), and that men continue to languish in Guantánamo as a result of it — and also as a result of the Obama administration’s unwillingness, or refusal to confront the very facts that Col. Wilkerson has disclosed.

Worthington's article is at: 
http://pubrecord.org/commentary/7416/wilkerson-demolishes-bush-cheney/

Wilkerson's signed statement (pdf) of March 24, 2010 is here.

Question of April 6:  Dear Mr. Bollyn, 

I have been reading many articles on the 9-11 atrocity and other major world events. I am a 46-year-old Ashkenazi Jew from London, England.  I believe the Rothschilds and the banking conspiracy are behind EVERYTHING. When I bring the subject up with my peers and family, I am told it is anti-Semitic nonsense, probably paid for by the Saudi Arabians.  If there is no actual proof, and the Rothschilds are so powerful, please help me to understand why so much data is available on the Internet.  Am I missing something?  Surely the Rothschilds would be able to prevent this data surfacing under libel or slander laws, or anti-defamation.  Thank you. I look forward to your reply. 

Answer:  Yes, the Rothschilds are behind much of what goes on - especially when it concerns the outlaw state of Israel.  The Rothschild family was the prime mover and financier of the Zionist project to settle Russian and Polish Jews in Palestine.  The 1917 Balfour Declaration which promised British support for a home for world Jewry in Palestine was addressed to Lord Rothschild (Lionel Walter, 2nd Baron Rothschild 1868-1937), head of the English branch of the Jewish banking family - and unofficial head of British Jewry.  The Balfour Declaration gave great impetus to the Zionist movement that eventually resulted in the state of Israel.  The Rothschild bankers were obviously calling the shots in Britain in 1917.  Lionel's father, the 1st Baron Rothschild, was able in 1875 to give £4,000,000 to Britain's first Jewish prime minister, D'Israeli (later Disraeli), to become the principal stockholder in the Suez Canal Company.

Prior to World War I Zionism represented only a minority of Jews, mostly from Russia, but led by Austrian and German Jews.  By 1914 there were about 90,000 Jews in Palestine; 13,000 settlers lived in 43 Jewish agricultural settlements, many of them supported by the French Jew Baron Edmond de Rothschild.

The Rothschilds are able to control governments by being primary lenders of money to national banks, like the Federal Reserve.  In the past 40 years the United States has gone from being the largest creditor nation to becoming the largest debtor nation.  This is how the U.S. has lost its independence and much of its felicity.  The greater the debt, the greater the control gained by the international bankers like the Rothschilds. (to be continued...)  

Question of April 2:  I just listened to Dr. Sabrosky's broadcast. He was pretty convincing although I felt he was a little short on details. He seemed to place a great deal of his case on the fall of WTC 7, but never once did he say anything about Larry Silverstein and only one very brief mention of nano-thermite.  9-11 was such a complicated operation and required the cooperation of many people.  I'm sure you have told us before, but why was it necessary to bring down WTC 7?  The fall of WTC 7 is so obviously controlled demolition, why would those responsible take the risk of exposing their crime by demolishing 7 in this way? There had to have been something in that building that was so important to make it worth their great risk to demolish it. Or did they simply feel so confident that they could do this in plain sight and have complete confidence in their control of our government and media?

Answer:  The demolition of WTC 7 is the event that revealed to Dr. Alan Sabrosky and Dr. Steven Jones (and many others) that the official version of 9-11 is a pack of lies.  Destroying WTC 7 was obviously crucial to the whole false-flag terror operation.  There are two main explanations for this.  First, it may have housed equipment and personnel that played a role in the destruction of the WTC towers, for example in the specially fortified bunker on the 22nd or 23rd floor.  Secondly, it housed the offices of federal agencies involved in investigations of serious financial crimes.  The destruction of the evidence would have been crucial in both cases.  The vault beneath WTC 6 held much of the evidence for the federal agencies in WTC 7 and this vault was evidently cleaned out the night before 9-11, according to Kurt Sonnenfeld, the FEMA photographer who looked into it.  The Zionist perpetrators have complete confidence that they could get away with this because of their control of our government and media, as you say, but the real key was having control of the buildings prior to 9-11 and having Michael Chertoff in the key position to control the destruction of the evidence and non-investigation of the crime.

WTC 7 was owned by Larry Silverstein and had been built with Israeli contractors in the mid-1980s, when the Zionist plan for the destruction of the WTC had already been developed.  The main strategic reason for the Israeli false-flag terror of 9-11 was to usher in the "War on Terror" and bring the U.S. military into the Middle East on a permanent basis - to protect Israel's hegemony in the region.  See: "America the Target: 9-11 and Israel's History of False Flag Terrorism"
http://www.bollyn.com/america-the-target-9-11-and-the-history-of-false-flag-terrorism 

Question of March 26:  In a recent radio interview, Dr. Alan Sabrosky (a former director of the US Military War College, General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research, among other highly impressive credentials) stated that top American military brass know Israel did 9/11. A four part series of this interview is on Youtube. Dr. Sabrosky stated that in recent weeks he has brought this to the attention of many high level military contacts, who now realize Israel's role in 9/11. Do you believe it's true that top military officers are just now beginning to realize what you've been saying, and if so, what might be the outcome?

Dr. Alan Sabrosky discusses increasing awareness in the U.S. military that Israel is behind 9-11 and disastrous war policies in Iraq and Afghanistan.

IT IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT CERTAIN that 9-11 was a Mossad operation - period.
- Dr. Alan Sabrosky

If these Americans and those like them ever fully understand just how much of their suffering - and the suffering we have inflicted on others - is properly laid on the doorsteps of Israel and its advocates in America, they will sweep aside those in politics, the press and the pulpits alike whose lies and disloyalty brought this about and concealed it from them. They may well leave Israel looking like Carthage after the Romans finished with it. It will be Israel’s own great fault.
-  Alan Sabrosky, "Treason, Betrayal and Deceit: 9/11 and Beyond", Sept. 10, 2009
Sabrosky (Ph.D, University of Michigan) is a ten-year U.S. Marine Corps veteran and a graduate of the US Army War College.

Answer:  In the video clip, Dr. Alan Sabrosky (who says that he has Jewish ancestors) claims he has informed people at the highest levels of the U.S. military that Israeli Mossad criminals are behind 9-11.  He says that most of the people in the U.S. military brass were not aware of Israel's role in 9-11 and are truly shocked and enraged when they realize that the U.S. has been duped and deceived by Israeli intelligence.  I don't doubt that for a minute.  I believe that the 9-11 deception was not understood by the people at the top.  This is why the title of my book is Solving 9-11 - The Deception that Changed the World. 

Had the deception of the false-flag terror atrocity been widely understood in the military, I certainly would not have been attacked, maliciously prosecuted, and tried in a corrupt Chicago court in 2007 with virtually no support from the U.S. military and other institutions.  Articles about the conspiracy behind the brutal police attack and my trial can be found in The Bollyn Trial section. 

There has, however, been a very significant and noticeable sea change in how the U.S. and British governments and media treat Israel during the past few weeks and I think that Dr. Sabrosky's revelations may be connected with that change.  I am very encouraged by this development, to say the least.

Question of March 17:  Just today, Wayne Madsen has disclosed another very important link in the chain of evidence: he reports that an El Al 747 departed from JFK for Tel Aviv at 4:11 p.m. on 9/11/2001 and it was full.  Would you please pause for a moment to contemplate the evidentiary significance of confirming the complete list of passengers who embarked for Tel Aviv on that unauthorized flight?

Answer: I would expect that Ehud Olmert and many of the Israelis who were behind the terrorism of 9-11 were on this plane.  As I pointed out in December 2007, Ehud Olmert, the Likudnik mayor of Jerusalem and deputy prime minister of Israel, was in New York City on the eve of 9-11.  The fact that this high level Israeli politician was in New York City on September 10, 2001 has been kept secret.  I would assume that this visit has been kept secret because it involved the false-flag terror attacks of the following day.  I suspect that Olmert was in New York City during the attacks.  It would, of course, be very interesting to get the passenger list.  I will see what I can do. 

Question and Comment:  With the information that is now available, why has the insurance company that paid off on Lucky Larry’s [Silverstein] fraudulent World Trade Center terrorism claim not made some kind of effort to get their money back?  Hope you can provide some insight on this. I would also like to comment on my view of the state of the world.  Obviously things were not “hunky dory” prior to 9-11, but since that fateful day, the criminal network has been given a blank check to do anything.  The American populace seems asleep, thinking only of shopping, sports, money – just making it through their own lives.

Answer:  This is a very good question.  Much of the money that has been paid out in 9-11 claims has actually come from U.S. taxpayer funds.  I had read that the insurance companies were actually reimbursed in this way, but have not seen the documentation.  The recently litigated payout to the first responders came from a $1 billion FEMA fund, for example.  I will try to check if the WTC insurers were also compensated with U.S. taxpayer money. 

One thing that needs to be understood about the ownership of the WTC towers is that agents of the state of Israel became the de facto owners of the WTC when Silverstein took control of the towers in late July 2001.  "Sources in the Port Authority intimated that even though they were still in the vicinity, Silverstein was in control," Haaretz reported in its 2001 article, "Up in smoke".  Through the Silverstein takeover, which was supervised by Lewis Eisenberg of the Port Authority, agents of Israeli intelligence gained access and complete control of the WTC property that was the target of their carefully planned terrorist attack. 

Lewis Eisenberg at the scene of the crime - Eisenberg, a partner at Goldman Sachs, was the head of the Port Authority (the owner of the World Trade Center) in 2001 and was the key person who facilitated the property falling into the hands of Larry Silverstein.

The Silverstein takeover was essential to the Israeli's evil plan because in order to carry out such a sophisticated false-flag terror operation with complete security, owning the property was a requirement.  Here are the three principal agents of the takeover:

Larry Silverstein, former owner of Runway 69, a Queens strip club, is a close friend and business partner of Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak.  Silverstein has been close to Netanyahu since he served as Israel's ambassador to the United Nations.  "For years they kept in close touch.  Every Sunday afternoon, New York time, Netanyahu would call Silverstein," Haaretz reported.  "It made no difference what the subject was or where Netanyahu was, he would always call, Silverstein told an Israeli acquaintance.  A recent article on Voltairenet.org claims that Silverstein was treasurer of Netanyahu's terrorism school, the mysterious Jonathan Institute and of his electoral campaigns.  I have not seen that before and will look to see if it is true.  A good article on Silverstein's friendship and business connections to Netanyahu and Barak is "Up in Smoke" from the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz.  (American Friends of the Jonathan Institute was established in Washington, D.C. in March 1977 and in New York City in care of Feder & Gopin in June 1977, two years before its first conference.)  Silverstein was accused, along with Bill Clinton and Colin Powell, of being involved in drug smuggling and other crimes in a 1997 lawsuit Harry P. Miller v. Larry Silverstein, et al.


Lloyd M. Goldman, Silverstein's behind-the-scenes equity partner on the World Trade Center lease, was chairman of the finance committee of the American Associates of Ben Gurion University in 2000 and is currently national vice president.  Ben Gurion University is affiliated with Israel's Nuclear Research Center - Negev (NRCN), which is involved in developing nano-composite energetic materials like the super-Thermite which was found in the dust of the pulverized Twin Towers.  The crucial question about 9-11 that needs to be answered is who made the super-Thermite that demolished the concrete of the World Trade Center, and who applied it to the interior surfaces, probably the undersides of the 220 floor pans?  The evidence indicates that 9-11 was an Israeli-engineered act of false-flag terrorism, which would mean that Israel probably produced the nano-composite of Thermite.  The Nuclear Research Center Negev, which is where Israel produces its nuclear weapons, has long been involved in development of super-Thermite.  Lloyd Goldman's close connection to Ben Gurion University means that getting super-Thermite from the NRCN into the Twin Towers would practically be an in-house operation.  Goldman is poised to take over the World Trade Center project when Silverstein, who is nearly 80, retires.  See - "Meet the Other Trade Center Builder", Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2008

Frank Lowy, the third key partner in the World Trade Center takeover.  Born in 1930 into a family of modest means in Slovakia (then Czecho-Slovakia), Lowy spent the war years in Budapest, then moved to Palestine where he fought in the underground for the Zionist army, the Haganah. By 17, he was in an elite commando unit of the Israeli Army, fighting behind enemy lines in the War of Independence. In 2006 he established Israel's Institute for National Security Studies, which incorporates the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies.

Comment of March 8:  Chris, just wanted you to see this article....dang, I don't understand people lying about you this way, just wanted you to see it, thank you, and keep up the good work, N. 
http://www.takeourworldback.com/bollynfalseflag.htm

Bollyn Responds:  I have not read the whole article but can clearly see by the style and content that it is written by Michael Bernard Piper (a.k.a. Michael Collins Piper) of American Free Press.  This is obviously more of his nonsensical lies and slander.  One needs to understand that Piper is paid to attack me on behalf of the Zionist Jew Mark Lane and the controlled opposition/flypaper outfit Lane runs out of the Liberty Lobby.  If there was a fire in the HVAC unit on the roof of the building of the former I.B.M. Global Network Services (sold to AT&T a year before I left the company in May 2000), how should I know about it and what does it have to do with me?  I was living in Germany where I had been since November 2001.  How should I know about a minor fire in Schaumburg, Illinois?  The main point of the article is to attack my credibility by calling me a liar, a Judas Goat, and an "intelligence operative".  The detailed information about Piper and his show indicates that the source of the article is Piper, and he is lying throughout.  He is the Judas Goat who is projecting his sins on me in an effort to sow suspicion about my work and motives.  When Piper says that he "allowed" me to stand in and host his show during the summer of 2006 he is using the wrong word.  I was asked to do this and tried to avoid it because it was an extra obligation that I would have difficulty doing as I was on the road in the western United States.

The real question is why does Piper, who lavished fulsome praise on me everytime he had me on his show in 2006 about being "America's best journalist, bar none", spend so much time and effort attacking me?  Piper has obviously been tasked to do everything he can to sow suspicion about me and try to discredit my research and writing.  He reveals how he tries to damage my credibility in these lines:

If Bollyn really were an honest truth teller and genuine investigative journalist, he would not be lying like this. And if a supposedly honest journalist is known to be lying about some matters of fact, how can his word be trusted on anything? Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.

It is interesting that Piper and Eric Hufschmid are doing the exact same thing, albeit in different ways.  Hufschmid claims that I have been kidnapped and that my articles are being written by the Mossad, while Piper calls me a liar and intelligence operative.  Both of them want to sow suspicion, which once planted in a reader's mind, is very difficult to remove.  But, what have I done to deserve this treatment? 

Answer:  I have investigated and revealed too much about what really happened on 9-11. 

This is the same reason I was treated by the undercover police in Hoffman Estates as I was, and prosecuted as I was.  It is interesting to note that Piper takes the word of the corrupt police of Chicagoland as gospel truth.  My statement that the water had been turned off in the cell and that I was told "drink from the toilet" is supposedly disproven by the fact that there is a photo of a Hoffman Estates jail cell with a sink and toilet.

Michael Piper

It should be noted that Piper sent me a very nasty email in December 2001 as we prepared to go to Moscow for a 9-11 conference.  I thought at the time that it couldn't possibly be from Piper and that someone must have hacked into his mailbox, but I now realize that this is exactly how he operates.  He acts like he has a license to lie.  He has never been a friend of mine.

Question of March 5:  Is Barbara Olson back from the dead?  An anonymous person sent me a photo of Barbara Olson (said to have died on 9-11) side-by-side with an image of Lady Booth, the wife of Theodore Olson, former U.S. Solicitor General.  There is no doubt that these two women look nearly identical.  The question is whether the Barbara Olson (born Barbara Kay Bracher in Houston on December 27, 1955) is the same person as Lady Evelyn Booth (born in Louisville, Kentucky, on October 26, 1960) - or do they simply look very similar?  While it is certainly possible with plastic surgery and the theft of an identity that this could happen, it is also possible that Ted simply chose a new wife that looked very much like his previous wife.

The similarity between the two wives of Ted Olson is remarkable.  Is Lady Booth really Barb Olson after plastic surgery?  The face on the right seems to have had cosmetic surgery.



Barbara Olson's ear, seen here, can be compared with those of Lady Booth.  Are they similar?


Lady Booth Olson

This is an interesting question, which I will look into.  What is very interesting about Barbara Bracher is that she earned her Juris Doctor at Yeshiva University in New York City.  Yeshiva University is a private Jewish school which is very Jewish.  Why would a young Catholic girl, who had worked for H.B.O. and Stacy Keach in Hollywood, choose to study law at Yeshiva University?  It is possible that Barb Olson has Jewish roots and that this is why she chose Yeshiva University.  Another odd thing about Barbara Bracher is that she lived in McLean, Virginia in the early 1990s which makes one wonder if she was working for the C.I.A. 

While Barbara Olson had very close connections to orthodox Jews and Zionism, her husband actually worked to protect the crimes of the state of Israel when he defended the Israeli spy, Jonathan Jay Pollard.  How did he get that case - and why did he take it?  Ted and Barbara Olson's ties to Israeli intelligence need to be taken into consideration when pondering their roles in the false flag terror of 9-11.

As a partner of the law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Theodore Olson served as lead counsel for George W. Bush in Bush v. Gore before the U.S. Supreme Courth, which secured Bush's election as President of the United States. Bush then appointed Olson as United States Solicitor General which he was from, 2001-2004.  At Yeshiva University, Ted Olson recalled that Barbara Bracher had been the person who officially kicked the Palestinian office out of the United States:

In her third year of law school [Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University], Barbara somehow managed to finesse herself into an internship in the Department of Justice in Washington. And, as a very brassy and gutsy intern, she managed to be the only employee of the government of the United States willing, feisty, and fearless enough to personally serve the papers on the PLO mission to the United Nations in New York announcing that it was being expelled from this country—because they were terrorists. How proud Barbara was to tell that story to her friends at Cardozo!

Question of March 2:  Have you heard that it is very possible that Dr. Steven Jones and his nano-thermite theory could very well be misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement down a false path?  Dr. Judy Wood theorizes that a Directed Energy Weapon was used to turn the steel into dust. Her theory is very compelling, and this could very well explain why Steven Jones has gotten so far with his nano-thermite theory.

Answer: Yes, I have heard about that theory.  I was probably the first person to have written about this "theory" of a directed energy beam being involved in 9-11 after having an interview with a "former" spy from East Germany, who admitted to having worked with the Mossad.  See: http://www.bollyn.com/mossad-in-germany-and-9-11-disinfo 

The evidence, however, of nano-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center is solid proof that this advanced nano-composite explosive was used to pulverize the towers.  This is not to say that other explosives were not used, such as cutter charges on the central columns or huge bombs in the basements of the towers.  As Dr. Jones would say, the data doesn't lie.  The theory of an energy weapon being used to demolish the towers is not supported by the evidence.  I consider it to be a kind of red herring theory meant to distract people from the evidence of explosives and super thermite. 

Question of February 26:  It's been at least a week with no postings on your website?  Are you OK?  Inquiring minds want to know...

Bollyn Responds:  Yes, I am fine.  I have been busy doing the final editing of the first 14 chapters of my book, Solving 9-11 - The Deception that Changed the World.  I did this and printed out the chapters for a supporter in Canada who requested a copy of the book.  This took some time away from the article that I am working on, which is about Kenneth Feinberg, the Special Master of the 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund.  It will come as no surprise that Kenneth Feinberg is a high-level agent of the Israeli government and the Mossad.  This article involved quite a bit of research but I hope to have it published in the coming days.

9-11 Special Master Kenneth Feinberg and his wife Diane "Dede" Shaff Feinberg are high-level agents of the state of Israel.  Feinberg and his law firm was given an open account from the U.S. Treasury and doled out billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars - without any oversight or accountability - to the families of 9-11 victims to keep them from seeking justice and discovery through the courts.  Some 98 percent of the 9-11 families took the money from the fund.  Who got how much and who all got paid in the process is a closely guarded secret.  Why?  The 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund is U.S. taxpayer money after all.  We have every right to see how it was disbursed.

 
Alvin K. Hellerstein: Orthodox Jew and devoted Zionist
The same law that created the 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund also stipulated that all 9-11 related lawsuits would go through the U.S. District Court of Manhattan, where Alvin K. Hellerstein, an orthodox Jew and devoted supporter of Israel has prevented any case from going to trial.  Nearly every single lawsuit concerning a victim of 9-11 has been settled out of court.  Thanks to the efforts of the dedicated Zionist team headed by Kenneth Feinberg and Alvin Hellerstein it is very unlikely that there will ever be a 9-11 trial for the worst terror crime in U.S. history.  What kind of justice is that?  Who are they protecting?
 

Comment:  I am reading your book, Solving 9/11. Your quote attributed to Menachem Begin "We are the master race" supposedly delivered at a meeting of the Knesset seems far fetched. Did you check the source of that quote? I did a little checking and read that it was invented by Texe Marrs. Do you have any sources for the quote? Thanks, your work is fascinating.

Bollyn Responds: The addition of the Begin quote was a recent change.  Since the quote cannot be sourced, I have removed it. The text now uses the Begin quote from Kapeliouk’s article: "[The Palestinians] are beasts walking on two legs." - Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, "Begin and the 'Beasts,"' New Statesman, June 25, 1982. 

Comment from a Gulf War Vet: 

Hello, I am not sure if this goes to Mr. Bollyn or not but I am giving it a shot.  I was reading your August 15, 2004 article on depleted uranium and Gulf War Vets. I was a combat engineer during the Gulf War and I wanted to support your article.  I am 39 years old and have spent my days since the war in college and now I teach school. I am a non-smoker and live a simple life.  In December I was diagnosed with kidney cancer and it spread a bit to the lymphnods.  The surgery was hell and now I face a life with cancer.  Well thanks for your time and thanks so much for your article on this subject. I am filing a claim with the VA.

Bollyn's Response:  This vet is suffering from the effects of D.U. exposure, as are many others.  This is an extremely dangerous weapon that should be banned.  My four-part series on depleted uranium can be read here:  http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/2004/08/15_bollyn_depleted-uranium-blamed-cancer.htm

Marion Fulk and Christopher Bollyn
My research on "depleted" uranium weapons was aided immensely by Marion Fulk of Livermore, California (left).  Marion spent most of his working life as a scientist in the employ of the U.S. government, from the Manhattan Project to Livermore Lab.  Now retired, Fulk said he wanted to help inform the public of the long-term damage to human health caused by the use of uranium-tipped weapons.

Question:  Do you post or send articles to Rense and Jones?  Did look, can't find much recent.

Answer:  Websites that post my material or links to my articles do so of their own choosing.  Two very good sites that re-post my material are RebelNews.org and TruthSeeker.co.uk.  Here is the link to some of my material on RebelNews.org and here is the link to my material on TruthSeeker.co.UK:  http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/columnist.asp?ID=6

Question:  Can't even say in words how much I appreciate such extremely rare honest reporting in these dangerous times!  Suggestion: Times are tough--can you add a $5 button to the array of PayPal buttons for donations, since even $10 might be too out of reach for some?

Answer:  Yes, I will do that.  

Comment:  Re the black box on Flight 77 shows "cabin doors not open" means nothing since there was no evidence that a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon. There was no released video of Pentagon crash. No recognizable Boeing 757 parts, the penetration of the walls was too deep and too narrow for a 757, no wing or engine marks on building, etc.  So, why do you think this story is special?  Just curious?

Bollyn's Response:  You are quite right.  There is no evidence that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon nor do I think that one did crash into the building.  We don't know where this black box of Flight 77 really came from but the story is about an independent investigation of the data on the box that is said to be from Flight 77.  It is just another small piece of the puzzle showing the massive deception of 9-11.